<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coming to terms with contemporary art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.hecker.org/2009/07/19/coming-to-terms-with-contemporary-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.hecker.org/2009/07/19/coming-to-terms-with-contemporary-art/</link>
	<description>Trying to unite civility and truth in a few long blog posts</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 14:12:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hecker</title>
		<link>http://blog.hecker.org/2009/07/19/coming-to-terms-with-contemporary-art/#comment-890</link>
		<dc:creator>hecker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 13:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hecker.org/?p=834#comment-890</guid>
		<description>Gerv, my apologies for mischaracterizing your position. For what it&#039;s worth you&#039;re correct, &quot;The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living&quot; is in fact a pretentious title; that may be part of the point. (Though to be honest a lot of artwork titles are pretentious.)

However I disagree with you regarding IKB. If we&#039;re going to accord art status to monochromatic works (which I think we should, and certainly the art world has accepted them as such), then I think IKB qualifies, especially given its status as the personal expression of Yves Klein.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gerv, my apologies for mischaracterizing your position. For what it&#8217;s worth you&#8217;re correct, &#8220;The Physical Impossibility of Death in the Mind of Someone Living&#8221; is in fact a pretentious title; that may be part of the point. (Though to be honest a lot of artwork titles are pretentious.)</p>
<p>However I disagree with you regarding IKB. If we&#8217;re going to accord art status to monochromatic works (which I think we should, and certainly the art world has accepted them as such), then I think IKB qualifies, especially given its status as the personal expression of Yves Klein.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerv</title>
		<link>http://blog.hecker.org/2009/07/19/coming-to-terms-with-contemporary-art/#comment-883</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 15:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hecker.org/?p=834#comment-883</guid>
		<description>As the colleague in the discussion in question, a clarification or two: I said some contemporary art wasn&#039;t art, and that the title of the shark work was very pretentious. I didn&#039;t say the shark wasn&#039;t art. I remembered the title because I&#039;d been having exactly the same conversation with someone else by email a few days before and had looked it up at the time. Although I admit the title is sticky - but only because of its pretentiousness. And the art is iconic.

My example of stuff which wasn&#039;t art was the copy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Klein_Blue&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;International Klein Blue&lt;/a&gt; hanging in Tate Modern.

Having said all that, I am quite happy to concede your point that art appreciation and criticism is a skill to be acquired.

Gerv</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As the colleague in the discussion in question, a clarification or two: I said some contemporary art wasn&#8217;t art, and that the title of the shark work was very pretentious. I didn&#8217;t say the shark wasn&#8217;t art. I remembered the title because I&#8217;d been having exactly the same conversation with someone else by email a few days before and had looked it up at the time. Although I admit the title is sticky &#8211; but only because of its pretentiousness. And the art is iconic.</p>
<p>My example of stuff which wasn&#8217;t art was the copy of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Klein_Blue" rel="nofollow">International Klein Blue</a> hanging in Tate Modern.</p>
<p>Having said all that, I am quite happy to concede your point that art appreciation and criticism is a skill to be acquired.</p>
<p>Gerv</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Juicer</title>
		<link>http://blog.hecker.org/2009/07/19/coming-to-terms-with-contemporary-art/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>The Juicer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 14:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.hecker.org/?p=834#comment-882</guid>
		<description>Nice post Frank, very lucid. 

I love Art, in all forms. To me expression in any form is beautiful. And I guess, I am biased in that sense. But yes, at times I do feel challenged when viewing and apprising contemporary works of art. I would love to read more from you on this topic, you have touched upon it in a very relatable manner (oh that&#039;s not a word!:D).

I will be checking out &#039;But is it Art?&#039; right away!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post Frank, very lucid. </p>
<p>I love Art, in all forms. To me expression in any form is beautiful. And I guess, I am biased in that sense. But yes, at times I do feel challenged when viewing and apprising contemporary works of art. I would love to read more from you on this topic, you have touched upon it in a very relatable manner (oh that&#8217;s not a word!:D).</p>
<p>I will be checking out &#8216;But is it Art?&#8217; right away!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
