Comments on: How labels could optimize eMusic vs. non-eMusic sales

By: Obligatory Michael Jackson post « Swindleeeee!!!!!

Obligatory Michael Jackson post « Swindleeeee!!!!! — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 05:21:00 +0000

[...] mind waiting a bit. (See my earlier blog posts on the economics of the Sony-eMusic deal and optimizing eMusic vs. non-eMusic sales for more on price discrimination in the eMusic context.) It’s essentially the same strategy [...]

By: Economics of eMusic and Sony « Swindleeeee!!!!!

Economics of eMusic and Sony « Swindleeeee!!!!! — Fri, 05 Jun 2009 06:18:33 +0000

[...] will Sony do this? By practicing price discrimination to identify and sell to more price-sensitive buyers: A person who doesn’t want to pay more at [...]

By: The letter Danny Stein didn’t write « Swindleeeee!!!!!

The letter Danny Stein didn’t write « Swindleeeee!!!!! — Wed, 03 Jun 2009 03:45:46 +0000

[...] 3. As noted above, eMusic’s focus was always on obtaining rights to sell older major label releases. I’ve never seen any indication that eMusic wanted to go head-to-head with the iTunes Store and Amazon in selling new major label releases. Also note that many independent labels have held new releases back from eMusic in an attempt to maximize revenue from other higher-priced outlets, in an attempt at price discrimination. [...]

By: luckybleu

luckybleu — Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:40:39 +0000

QTRAX is coming signed sealed delivered

By: NOW Ensemble, and more on indie classical « Swindleeeee!!!!!

NOW Ensemble, and more on indie classical « Swindleeeee!!!!! — Sun, 24 Feb 2008 05:04:44 +0000

[...] time. (If the latter then this would be an example of the release window strategy I mentioned in a previous post.) In any case I ended up buying the digital version directly from New Amsterdam Records; it’s [...]